Note: 9 Dec 2017.. Another update due to new information coming into my hands… I ran across a letter written in 1922 by one Alma Hurst, a descendant of William through his son Robert. She stated the following paraphrased..: That William was Scot but living in Ireland, that he was trained for the Presbyterian ministry, but did not go into that as he married Mary Harper, his cousin, causing the family to feel they had disgraced them. William and Mary then emigrated to America with their baby son Robert and spent some time “back east” (we know this was Pennsylvania) then went into Kentucky where William became a farmer. Alma states William was “mysteriously murdered” at aged 49.
Note: This post was updated to include information from Fleming County Court documents regarding William Harper that were kindly scanned and forwarded to me by my sister Cindy. 12/31/2011
I would normally post a picture of the subject of my post here… However… to my knowledge, there are no pictures of William Harper in existence. If this is in error, and some relative somewhere has such a picture, please have mercy and send me a copy!
The oldest confirmed photograph I have of any of William’s descendants that dates back the farthest is this one of his grandson, William W. Harper, and his wife, Nancy (Stoops) Harper. William W. was the son of Alexander, William Harper’s youngest son.

William W. and Nancy (Stoops) Harper, Circa 1880s
By far the most mysterious of my ancestors was my father’s 4th great-grandfather, William Harper. There are more convoluted stories and rumors connected to William than you can shake a stick at.
Some of those stories are purely rumors; some are factual, based on county and court documents. Taken all together, they show that William was a pretty interesting man. He was a successful farmer, a family man, a bit of a rascal, occasionally a curmudgeon, and a man bent on at least one form of long-lasting vengeance for a wrong done to him.
The rumors are varied and some are completely wild. They include claims that he came from a wealthy background in Ireland, that he was a preacher, that he was a teacher at William & Mary College, that he had a son named William (who is absent from any records that I can find,) that he was the owner of the infamous Harper’s Ferry, that he was a drunkard who stabbed one of his sons-in-law, and that he was murdered brutally in his old age.
Before expounding on those rumors, I’ll tell you what I do know about William, and what is actually based in truth and backed up by contemporary documents. I’ll also throw in some of my conclusions or suppositions that seem to fit with what we do know.
William was born in Ireland, around 1765. This is backed up by census records and matches some of the stories that the family has passed down. Based on his Presbyterian upbringing and the stories handed down, I’d say it’s a pretty good bet that William was indeed from Belfast, although some claim he came from Cork.
* Note here that the “accepted” story is that William came from Belfast. I tend to agree since Belfast is in Northern Ireland which does make sense, all things considered.
William was of the Presbyterian faith. Based on that, and the old Scottish surname of Harper, I also strongly believe that William was of Scottish descent. If my history is correct, his ancestors probably migrated to Ireland after the Battle of the Boyne, when Northern Ireland was heavily colonized by the English and Scots.
Why William decided to leave Ireland was a complete mystery to me until recently. Some family researchers like to say that he was the son of a wealthy horse breeder, but no explanation is given for his leaving Ireland. I tended to think that he was probably a younger son who inherited money but no land, and who left to find more opportunity, and land, in America. As it turns out, it was neither. According to Alma Hurst’s letter written in 1922, William and Mary left Ireland after marrying and being considered in disgrace as they were cousins. Who would have thought!
What is clear is that William did have some money when he came over, as he was able to purchase quite a bit of land when he settled in Kentucky. Before that though, they went into southwestern Pennsylvania where they either met up with, or continued to travel with a group of people who all eventually ended up in Fleming County, Kentucky.
Some of these associated families were the McAtinnie’s, the Burks, the Prices, the Cowans, the Faris’s, the Sousley’s, and the Shockeys. Many of these families also married into the Harper family, as William and Mary eventually had at least eight children, three sons and five daughters.
An interesting side note here is that Alexander Harper, William’s youngest son, (and my father’s 3rd great grandfather) married a girl by the name of Sarah Burk. Her mother was Caty Sousley. Caty was a member of the same Sousley clan that eventually produced the WW2 US Marine, Franklin Sousley, who was immortalized in the iconic photograph of Marines raising the American flag at Iwo Jima, Japan. Franklin, then just a young man of 19 years, died at Iwo Jima and is buried in Elizaville in Fleming County, Kentucky, not far from the Harper farm.
The story goes that when she learned of Franklin’s death, his mother could be heard screaming all night by neighbors who lived a quarter of a mile away. It’s a sad story all the way around.
Although Caty must have been a great-great aunt or cousin to Franklin, and they were separated by at least two generations and one century, it’s kind of neat to think that some of the same Sousley blood runs through our veins today…
But back to William…
William’s Last Will and Testament lists his wife Mary, and their children who were living at the time the will was written, somewhere around 1814. The sons listed were Robert, the eldest, John, and Alexander. The girls were Peggy, Polly, Jenny, Letty, and Sally.
Interestingly, there are old microfiche records that claim all but Robert were born in Albemarle, Virginia. I don’t know if this is accurate or not, but tend to disbelieve it. They may well have been born right there in Fleming County, and I believe that they probably were. To confuse the issue though, that part of Kentucky was a part of Virginia until about 1792 when Kentucky became a state. Until then, it was Kentucky County, Virginia. So I’m not sure where Albemarle would have come into the picture, as it’s clear that William settled directly in Fleming County after leaving Pennsylvania according to contemporary accounts.
William was undoubtedly a farmer. He was also a slave owner, which is particularly interesting in the context that some of his grandsons would take up arms for opposing sides during the Civil War.
He had at least two decently sized farms or “plantations,” one of which he lived upon (and left to his son Robert) and another that he left to his second-born son, John. I suspect strongly that part of his farming operation had to do with horse breeding, as this seems to have been carried on down through at least a few generations of Harpers that followed. William’s grandson, William W. Harper, in his old age, was killed while training a horse at his farm near Ponca City, Oklahoma.
From what I have found in the absence of many records concerning William’s early life in Kentucky aside from deeds and land purchases, William must have lived in relative obscurity and presumably in relative peace there in Fleming County, at least until his daughter Sally married a man by the name of Edward Callahan in the early 1800s.
For whatever reason, Edward “greatly incurred William’s displeasure” and apparently William held a grudge against Edward Callahan. According to records, he was “reconciled” with Edward for some time before his death, but his will was never changed.
What exactly transpired between the two men is now lost to history. But we do know from court records that William liked his whiskey now and then, and that he must also have had a bit of a temper (which would make sense, as the Harper temper is nearly famous); as proof of this, documents show that he was once prosecuted for swearing in his own home.
If memory serves me right, William was convicted and fined but I don’t recall the sum.
* Updated with transcription of documents provided by my sister 12/31/2011.
“Greeting we command you to summon William Harper to appear before the (??) Judges of the Fleming Circuit Court at the Courthouse in Fleming County on the first day of the next September Term to answer of the following presentment of the Grand Jury, to wit, The Grand Jury impannelled [sic] and sworn for the body of the Fleming Circuit composed of the County of Fleming at a Circuit Court holden [sic] therefore at the June term thereof in the year 1813 in the name and by the authority of the Commonwealth of Kentucky.
Upon their oath present William Harper (farmer) for profanely swearing two oaths using profanity in each, the words, “By God,” at his own house in the County of Fleming on the 4th day of June 1813 contrary to the statute in that case made and provided and against the peace & dignity of the Commonwealth of Kentucky from the information of Richard Moore (farmer) living in Fleming County and not of the Grand Jury but summons to give evidence before (them??) Benjamin Broward, Foreman
And he shall innowise [sic] omit under the penalty of [100 pounds] and have them (here) it is writ. Witness Thomas Dougherty Clerk of arms and Court at the Court at the Courthouse as of the 16th day of June 1813 and the 22nd year of the Commonwealth. Tho Dougherty
Summons Richard Moore to support the foregoing presentment. Tho Dougherty”
A second similar document shows that William was also summoned to Court for being drunk on the 11th of June, 1813. The witness in that case was the same Richard Moore.
I don’t know what it would have taken in the early 1800s to be publicly taken to task for cursing or drinking alcohol at home, in one’s own castle, so to speak, but as a retired cop, I can imagine that there was a lot more to that story than documents show, and that might have been the very least of whatever happened at William’s house that brought out the law for a visit.
Taking all of this into consideration, it may just be that William could have been a little mean and testy when he was drinking, and that may or may not have had something to do with the problems he had with Edward.
Whatever started the feud between the two men, when William wrote his will, he put in a specific clause regarding Edward Callahan and his daughter, Sally, and what they were entitled to receive from his estate, which was just next to nothing. The clause itself seems funny to me because of the way it is worded.
But I’m certain it was no laughing matter to Edward or Sally, particularly when William had left very generous sums to his other daughters, who received $500 each at his death. And I’m sure it would have been particularly disheartening to Edward and Sally to learn that they had no inheritance if William and Edward actually did make up their differences before William died as other documents claim.
This is excerpted from that will: (I’ve added some punctuation and corrected some misspellings to make reading a bit easier…)
“Item 8th
And Lastly I will and Bequeath to my Daughter Sally who is married to Edward Callahan
the Sum of one Dollar, and to Edward Callahan I Will and Bequeath twenty five cents.
And it is to be fully understood by this my last Will and Testament that it is my Will and desire that my
Sons Shall have my land as Stated and that my Daughters shall be paid their respective Legacies
out of the proceeds of my household furniture, farming Utensils, Stock of every kind and grain
that may be on hand, my Negro Boy Bosin, and my Stills and Shilling Utensils, as well as all money
and Outstanding debts that may be Coming to me.
Likewise all my personal property of every kind Excepting only what is already Bequeathed and mentioned by me in this my last Will and Testament.
And further it is Will that in Case any of my Daughter Shall Marry She shall not be
entitled to the before mentioned legacies befor the death of their Mother unless such part as
She shall think proper to spare them taken Strict account of the Same and at the death of my
wife all the before mentioned property which I have allotted for the payment of my Daughters
Legacies is to be sold and Equally Divided amongst Peggy, Polly, Jenny, & Letty in manner
aforesaid, and if the proceeds of such Sale Shall not amount to more than two Thousand Dollars
including all charges exhibited aginst any of them for any thing recived after their Marriage
from their mother out my Estate and before my wifes death ,Then and in that case the overplus if
any there Shall be equally divided between Robert, John, Alexander, Peggy, Polly, Jenny, and
Letty.
And in Case John, Polly, Jenny, Alexander and Letty shall die before they Come of age or
any of them then the sums herein Bequeathed to such as shall decease shall be equally divided
amongst my Surving Children as well under as of full age with this Exception paying to Daughter
Sally one dollar and to her Husband Edward Callahan twenty five cents at every such death as
Shall happen in my family.
Furthermore it is my Will that my wife Mary and my Son Robert Shall be
my Executors to this my last Will and Testament”
Even though it may not be nice, I can’t help but think of Edward as “Two-Bit Callahan” based on that clause in William’s will.
After William died, you guessed it, Edward Callahan made the claim that William was incapable of being in charge of his own business when he wrote his will, and Edward challenged the will and must have won in Fleming County Court. Unfortunately I haven’t found that particular court record. Robert, William’s son and executor, then had to take the case to the Kentucky Court of Appeals to settle William’s estate.
The Appellate Court asserted (in a nutshell) the opinion that although William was known to be a little too fond of his whiskey on occasion, and the fact that in his later years he wasn’t as sharp of a manager as he had been when younger, he was also obviously capable of making his own decisions regarding his own property. Even though they recognized that Edward and William had apparently made up, they upheld the will and sent “Two-Bit Callahan” home empty handed.
Now to address the rumors I listed at the top of this post, I think I can definitively state that William was neither a preacher nor a teacher, although he had trained to the minstry. I checked myself with William and Mary College several years ago and they have no record of any William Harper on the faculty in that era. William may have very well been the son of a horse breeder in Ireland, since it appears he knew his way around a farm and was successful enough to expand his operations during his lifetime. And let’s just permanently lay to rest the rumor that William was the owner of Harper’s Ferry. He never was and there’s no connection whatsoever between our William and that particular part of the country.
I think it’s been proven out by William’s will and the other court documents that he probably was a handful, at times a curmudgeon, probably a bit mean-spirited when he felt he had cause to be so. But it also appears that he was not consistently drunk, or mean, or a pain in the neck. It looks like he was probably a fairly normal person who had a bit of a temper and who hit the bottle on occasion a little bit too hard.
As to the rumor that William ever stabbed Edward, it’s absolutely true.
**As of 12/31/2011, again thanks to my sister, we now have information proving that William did indeed stab Edward Callahan…
Transcription of the records show an arrest warrant issued on October 10, 1813 by Fleming County Justice of the Peace, Henry Bruce.
“Fleming County for Commonwealth of Kentucky to any sheriff or constable of said County Greetings whereas Edward Callahan this day made oath before me the subscriber a Justice of the Peace for said County that William Harper (Farmer) of said County did on the 9th Inst at the house of said Callahan in the County also willfully and maliciously stab him with a large knife commonly called a butcher knife of the value of three shillings with the intention to kill him the said Callahan but death has not yet ensued.
These are therefore in the name and by the authority of said Commonwealth of Kentucky to require you to forthwith apprehend said William Harper and then bring him before me or some other Justice of the Peace for said County to answer the (presentment??) which is against the peace & dignity of the Commonwealth of Kentucky and contrary to the form of the Statutes in that each made and provided.
Given under my hand the 10th day of October, Henry Bruce”
William’s daughter, Polly Harper, was deposed in the case. According to Polly, William came home and told her that what he feared had happened, he had stabbed Edward, and that he had done it in self-defense due to Edward coming at him in the road and threatening him with a club.
Whatever led up to the confrontation is also a mystery, and unless further documentation is found it will likely remain so.
At any rate, Edward Callahan eventually asked the Court to dismiss the charges against William, which apparently, the Court did do.
The final mystery is that of William’s death.
One relative a few years back made the startling claim that William was murdered out on the road near his house by being bludgeoned to death and left laying there. Now, I think this would have made some court document or newspaper even back in 1815 when it allegedly happened. At the very least, I would think it would have been mentioned in the Appellate Court decision, considering that they did look into William’s history a bit.
Amazingly enough although I can’t find any major details on it, it’s true. Talley’s Kentucky Papers state that William died from a “broken skull.” Alma Hurst’s letter states William was “mysteriously murdered” at age 49. One other source (which is a little suspect as it paints William as a saintly man) claims (paraphrased) that he was killed by an Indian on the way to the Upper Blue Lick store.
Although there is no mention I can find in the court records, it seems to me that all of the suspicion would have had to have fallen directly on Edward Callahan, who was the only person we know for a fact that William had trouble with, (aside from Richard Moore, the witness in the swearing and drinking cases) and who we know William had claimed he stabbed for threatening him with a club in the road a year or so before William ended up dead in the road with a broken skull.
For whatever reason that may forever be lost to us, Edward Callahan appeared not to have any suspicion cast upon him, and lived apparently mostly in peace to the elderly age of 72 years, outliving William’s daughter and marrying a second time.
William’s widow, Mary, lived until about 1853 according to Alma Hurst’s letter, and after William died, she lived with her son Robert and his wife Margaret per the census records. According to relatives back in Kentucky, both William and Mary were buried on their farm and marble monuments were placed on their graves.
At some point, it is claimed that the markers were taken down and used as cornerstones for some building or another, but one relative still living in that area also claims to have found the missing tombstones “lying in a ditch” alongside one of the roads in Fleming County. This relative said they took the stones home with them and stored them in the basement.
Despite requests from me for at least a picture of these stones, I haven’t heard from this particular relative again. It wasn’t until after I had corresponded with this person that I recalled it may have been the same relative who told me about twenty years or so earlier that they had a chunk of William’s broken marble tombstone in their possession, so at this point I have to discount both of those versions of what might have happened to the markers that once stood over William and Mary’s graves.
It’s probably true that they were simply taken down and re-used as building stones. As much as I think that’s just about as low as a person can go in finding building materials, it has been known to happen.
A couple years ago my sister and I did make the trip to Frankfort, KY and we went through every mention of William Harper in the archives we could find. Much of that was his legal troubles and makes for some difficult but interesting reading. We also went into Fleming County, tracked down William’s house, which is still standing and is still inhabited to this day. We got a couple of poor photographs, but it is indeed a “good brick house” just as the records state.
William Harper’s “good brick house”
We also checked the Flemingsburg Cemetery again and came up empty. I believe that William and Mary were buried on their own land and their gravesites have been apparently lost to history, as the owner of the property now stated to me that there are no burials at that site that they know of.
Until something new may appear, this is pretty much everything I know about William Harper, and I hope this is at least of interest to other Harper descendants.
© SMBurns, Keeper of the Dead, Copyright 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017.